![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Left Lily Cole, Fiona Banner - Sky Art's 1 Art Matters. Source - http://www.1301pe.com/news/detail.asp?NewsID=489
I have been following the Lily Cole series Art Matters on Sky Arts 1. The Anthony Gormley one was interesting as was the Tacita Dean one (the latter was a former student at Falmouth Art college) - I even understood how she thought of herself as an artist rather than a photographer, as her film is closer to paintings than actual celluloid. The Fiona Banner one confused me somewhat.
Fiona Banner - Suspended Sea Harrier - Source: http://www.hambro-art.com/?voce=artdiary&sel_year=2010&sel_month=6
She was one of the Young British Artists from part of the London Britart scene of the late eighties/nineties, the same stable as Tracey Emin and Damien Hirst et al. Shortlisted for the Turner Prize in 2002, Banner has turned heads with her unusual work, from exhibiting a polished RAF Jaguar (see pic above) and producing printed works that are just purely ISBN numbers to producing powerful posters for the paralympians of the 2012 Olympics (see pic below). She is a little different to most artists - she writes what she sees on canvas.
Fiona Banner - Superhuman Nude (2011). Source - http://countereditions.com/uk/view-all/fiona-banner-limited-edition-print-1249u.html
She has produced such works as The Nam, based on her observations of six Vietnam films e.g. Full Metal Jacket, Platoon etc., but also creates 'wordscapes' - one being a 6 x 4 metre billboard entitled Arsewoman In Wonderlands (see pic below). The latter is a transcript of a porn film. Just words on a board, but it has a voyeuristic mirroring affect and gives the impression of being unsettling, but also of drawing you in. The actress Samantha Morton was part of Banner's 'written portrait' series - first posing in the nude, then reading out Banner's description to a live audience. Banner called it 'a striptease with words.' Lily Cole opted to do the same, stripped and then read out the painted descriptions of Banner's work.
,1998,132x173cm_screenprint_detail.jpg)
Some would argue that Banner is a writer, rather than an artist and I must admit, I struggle with this concept too. I understood the idea of writing the words onto canvass as part of a 'visual' nude, or using words as part of a painting or artifact (a friend's father-in-law does this as part of his artwork - I too have used the written word as part of my Hamlet art project eighteen months ago). I cannot get my head around this piece of work being a 'written word as art in itself' angle - not even as an abstract. I cannot see an image, or even sense one, only the story, which DOES leave nothing to the imagination. I am at odds with it, because I could get this from a book.
I can fully understand some of her work, from the Freudian 'Sea Harrier As Genitalia' viewpoint (interestingly, she has since melted down both the Jaguar and the Sea Harrier into ingots - truly emasculating the male 'Toys of War') and even the giant full stops and commas that are dotted around Tower Bridge, London (see above pic) have SOME meaning (try writing meaningful prose without punctuation - so there IS an artistic statement there already).
I am confused by my reaction to this idea, which is strange. I read about 'The Chongqing Novel House' (see above) a few years ago and I could see that as both a novel AND an artifact.
I feel more unnerved reading Banner's 'written portraits' than I ever would just seeing a nude painting or sculpture and possibly more uncomfortable hearing the subject read out Banner's observations of her. It could be argued that the work simply isn't my taste, or as one critic put it 'just conceptual bullshit.' I am not that worried about the fact that I don't 'get' the 'ISBN as Art,' nor 'The Nam' novels either, but I want to challenge why the poster board written word makes me uncomfortable, where a regular nude wouldn't. Is it because of the intimate space in my mind, rather than the visual concept before me?
I don't really think of myself as unusually repressed and usually I am able to think out of the box. So - help me here. Why am I not getting this concept of art and why does this also make me feel that I am way out of my comfort zone?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re: Part two.!
Date: 2014-08-27 03:33 pm (UTC)From:The philosophy module I did was about ethics - whether something is 'deontological' (where a decision is made around God-centered religion, with no exceptions to the rule) or 'teleological' (whether all things have been taken into consideration). The former is more 'black and white,' where as the latter is more 'shades between.' One day, i will explore some of the names you mentioned :-)
I am drawn to UK history more, because my father was well-versed in the late Mediaeval/Tudor period and his tastes influenced my understanding of it, plus I am very interested in the Victorians. However, as time goes by and I learn the finer details of Colonialism/Post Colonialism, I am far more interested in the stories of the indigenous people. I definitely enjoyed Chinua Achebe's 'Things Fall Apart' - he was clearly a story-teller of the old tradition before he became a writer.
Astronomy is different from Astrology - I am interested in space/planets/stars etc. I grew up in a very New Age family and know about astrology, but had differing points of view in regards to this. Will private message you about this later :-)
I appreciate your encouragement Loloo and don't do yourself down - you seem to have a very lively mind sparking there and I will look into many of the names that you have mentioned, so i can familiarise myself with them more.
Fee is indeed lovely - we met per chance on LJ when I was clearing out this LJ account in 2011. She had made a comment in response to LJ's 'Question of the Day' and we kept in contact. Alas, whereas I can appreciate other people's interest in 'Lord of the Rings' - I do not share the interest; I do however think that there have been many well-written fanfics that yourself, Fee and others have written :-)
I am glad you managed to flee your ex - life has now opened up for you and long may it continue to do so xxx
Re: Part two. and one!!
Date: 2014-08-28 09:07 am (UTC)From:Oh the existentialism and stuff. it was much MUCH nicer then... when we're young and idealistic. On reading this all I realise that life has taught me so many lessons that I can just giggle gently and dream of that week in l952 sitting on the Left Bank with a Marie Brizard (tastes like Absinthe!) and 'philosophising'... the world was so full of attemptable opportunities then. Now realism is more my scene. But enjoy them... seen from up here, they're lovely! Poor Camus, he's hilarious really... but so YOUNG! And Candide is a children's story about the pitfalls of being a grown-up! Delicious and not at all heavy.
I HAVE read 'Things Fall Apart'... gosh, how could i forget? I had to dump all my 'Friend-Books' when I set off to sail round the world... (we didn't but at least we made the Med and back.) I shall have to Amazon and get it back again. My poor Bookshelves. I did spend 9 months in Kenyan Africa being a Tour Guide for the Tsavo National Park... so... aaah "Kwa Heri- nchi zangu wapenzi."
And your Father into Mediaeval History to the Tudors... sounds like he had the same history teacher as me! That was my joy. I stopped at Jamey the One, after that ... erm. But Those were the really good history days.. wow. And jolly well documented as well, but leaving enough 'space' for the mind to flesh out the flesh! Oh Wonderful Dad. Writing AND History... gaaaahhhh. ENVY ENVY! (Neither of my parents ever picked up a book!) You must miss him. I think he must have had a super sense of humour too!
Fee has been a real BRICK, and such a GOOD friend. I can tell her anything and everything, and she will weep or laugh with me. And I hope I with her. She's just so sincere and true in real life too. I do miss her dreadfully, even after only a day or so in her company. I think of her as 'with me' most of the time. Such a buddy.
Soo.... I'm so enjoying catching up with everything I should have done over the last sixty years... and REALLY getting so much MORE out of it all. I agree - you do have to have 'life experience' really to write about philosophy and ethics with any sort of background sense... we were just dancing on clouds of hope then! Now - like you and Hubby... older feet must stay solid on the earth, even if our eyes are lifted to the stars!
Bless you and thanks so much for your super posts every day. I do really enjoy (solidly enjoy) them. So many one just flicks through and they make no impact at all.
Re: Part two. and one!!
Date: 2014-08-28 11:11 am (UTC)From:Dad and I had an awkward relationship for a long time - my parents split whilst I was in my early/mid teens and there had been an estrangement between us. The last ten years were good, though. We had a lot in common and got on really well.
Re: Part two. and one!!
Date: 2014-08-28 11:59 am (UTC)From:Good news tho is you're only 47!!! THAT is FANTASTIC... oh boy oh boy. OOOOH LOTS of life left to do LOTS of things! YAY and YAY.
Oh happy me now... dances off to eat huge shrimps and grated carrots, toms and cucumber. Bless.
Re: Part two. and one!!
Date: 2014-08-28 12:07 pm (UTC)From: